Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNdakidemi, Baltazar
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T06:25:15Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T06:25:15Z
dc.date.issued2023-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.58694/20.500.12479/2591
dc.descriptionA Dissertation Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Life Sciences of the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.description.abstractField margin plants provide habitats and food resources for natural enemies of pests (NEs), but their potential is poorly understood, particularly in the tropics and on smallholder farms. The experiments were conducted to test the potential of field margin plants on NEs. Sentinel plants were developed to collect Aphis fabae and Maruca vitrata parasitoids. Aphidius colemani was identified as the primary parasitoid of A. fabae. The dominant M. vitrata larval parasitoids were the Braconidae and Dolichogenidea, while the Platygastridae were the abundant egg parasitoids. The survey of field margins for plant-NE interactions in bean fields found that NEs most often interacted with Bidens pilosa (15.4%) and Euphorbia heterophylla (11.3%). Flowering plant species (Bidens pilosa, Lantana camara, Euphorbia heterophylla and Ageratum conyzoides) supported NEs out of bean growing season. In cage trials with an aphid- infested bean plant and a single flowering margin plant, the survival of A. colemani was more significant in the presence of E. heterophylla than B. pilosa, Tagetes minuta and Hyptis suaveolens. UV-fluorescent dye was applied to flowers of specific field margin plant species and NE was sampled from within the bean crop and field margins using sweep-netting and pan- traps, respectively. Captured insects were examined for the presence of the dye, indicative of a prior visit to the margin. Lady beetles and assassin bugs were abundant in plots with B. pilosa margins, hoverflies with T. minuta and Parthenium hysterophorus margins, and lacewings with T. minuta and B. pilosa margins. NEs were also sampled from high and low plant diversity bean fields using sweep netting and coloured sticky traps, comparing monocropped and intercropped farms. Overall, high-plant diversity fields had higher NEs than low-diversity fields. The field margin had a significantly higher number of NEs than the crop field. However, marginally higher populations of NEs in intercropping than in monocropping were observed, although the effect was not significant. To confirm that NE communities on farms predated Aphis fabae, we extracted and amplified A. fabae DNA from predatory insects. Fourteen lady beetle larvae, two lacewing larvae, and one assassin bug analyzed were found to contain A. fabae DNA, indicating all these groups can regulate the significant aphid pest of beans, A. fabae. A. colemani was a parasitoid that emerged from several non-aphid species collected from the field margins. Overall, NEs benefitted from field margin plants; those possessing extra floral nectaries had an added advantage. Thus, smallholder farmers protect the field margins for the added benefit of natural pest regulation in their fields and thus for food security and enhancing their livelihoods.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNM-AISTen_US
dc.subjectnatural scienceen_US
dc.titleField margin Plants support arthropod natural enemies in smallholder common bean farming systems in northern Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record